I love conversations like this! Itβs one of those questions that keep philosophers awake at night! The honest answer is to everything: it depends entirely on the lens you are looking through. In the realm of pure logic and mathematics, absolute truths definitely exist. They're true by definition within their own systems. They don't depend on human opinion, culture, or the state of the universe, however, the catch is always going to be human perception. Some people with a different cognitive worldview tend to overanalyze and over-conceptualize absoluteness which is an error in itself. It gets tricky because while an absolute physical reality exists, our understanding of it is always limited by our senses, but I think we prove by our existence & motivations everyday that absolute truths exist, otherwise everything would be utterly pointless. So we're doing something right.
Everything is built on assumptions. I'm not sure if you subscribed yet, but I think you'd really love my work based on the insights you're sharing here and some of the things you've reposted of mine. Please subscribe so we can stay up on each other
The ending is the part that stuck with me: "Give some grace today to the 'other guy', because they know the same amount of things you know, which is nothing."
Honored that you found something of value inside of it, and thank you for reading. Please, please subscribe. I'm trying to get some traction on this, and every new subscriber is tremendous motivation to continue writing new essays that hopefully continue providing things you find valuable. Thank you again @Dino
I love conversations like this! Itβs one of those questions that keep philosophers awake at night! The honest answer is to everything: it depends entirely on the lens you are looking through. In the realm of pure logic and mathematics, absolute truths definitely exist. They're true by definition within their own systems. They don't depend on human opinion, culture, or the state of the universe, however, the catch is always going to be human perception. Some people with a different cognitive worldview tend to overanalyze and over-conceptualize absoluteness which is an error in itself. It gets tricky because while an absolute physical reality exists, our understanding of it is always limited by our senses, but I think we prove by our existence & motivations everyday that absolute truths exist, otherwise everything would be utterly pointless. So we're doing something right.
Everything is built on assumptions. I'm not sure if you subscribed yet, but I think you'd really love my work based on the insights you're sharing here and some of the things you've reposted of mine. Please subscribe so we can stay up on each other
I subscribed like yesterday lol. Let's connect & we'll support each other's growth. I look forward to new content of yours
I love it!
I think you might like my piece 'Mystery.' My proposal to the solution for your argument is to be okay with the empty space of not knowing.
https://elizabethhayashi.substack.com/p/mystery?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=6srrme
The ending is the part that stuck with me: "Give some grace today to the 'other guy', because they know the same amount of things you know, which is nothing."
I hadn't thought about it from that angle before. Thanks for sharing.
Honored that you found something of value inside of it, and thank you for reading. Please, please subscribe. I'm trying to get some traction on this, and every new subscriber is tremendous motivation to continue writing new essays that hopefully continue providing things you find valuable. Thank you again @Dino
Yes, absolutely Iβll subscribe. Iβm looking forward to reading more of your work.
Wow this is amazing love your creativity on this piece :)
Thank you. I just subscribed to you. Please subscribe to me for more future essays like it.
Thank you did as well